“Access to technology is not the liberating or empowering
thing that we expect it to be. As composition teachers, deciding whether or not
to use technology in our classes is simply not the point – we have to pay
attention to technology. When we fail to do so, we share in the responsibility
for sustaining and reproducing an unfair system that enacts social violence and
ensures continuing illiteracy under the aegis of education.” –Cynthia Selfe
I believe:
1: That our notions of digital native and digital immigrant are
problematic; as students today, in the various parts of the United States and the world,
still lack access to technologies and to teachers who know how to effectively
use them. That by assuming all students have access to technologies, we do a
disservice to students and further perpetuate the dominant power structures already in
play in society.
2: That literacy entails socially constructed practices;
that is, what determines a person to be literate is socially constructed. That
we have a responsibility, as composition instructors, to ensure that students
are literate in writing across various social situations. Those situations may
be dependent on the specific context of both the teacher and students in
question; some students will engage in different social situations than others.
Just as one should not only teach digital literacy, one should not only teach
print literacy.
3: That composition teachers have a responsibility to ensure
that all students have access to literacy practices; that teachers not let
their personal prejudices and biases affect the types of literacy they engage
in and teach in the composition classroom.
No comments:
Post a Comment